|
THE WORLD OF PERCEPTIONS
We
Can Never Reach The Original Of The World That Occurs Within
Our Brain
As has been
demonstrated here, everything that we live through, see, hear
and feel in our life occurs within the brain. For example,
someone who looks out of the window while sitting on an armchair
feels the hardness of the armchair and the slipperiness of
the fabric in his brain. The smell of the coffee coming from
the kitchen occurs in the mind, not in the kitchen some distance
away. The view of the sea, birds and trees he sees from the
window are all images formed in the brain. The friend who
is serving the coffee, and the taste of the coffee also exist
in the brain.

A person who is observing a particular
view supposes that he is watching the view before his
eyes. However, that view actually forms in the center
of vision at the back of the brain. The pertinent question
is this: who is that takes pleasure from watching this
view, if it cannot be the brain, which is made of lipid
and protein?
|
|
Imagine
that you are entering a dark room which has a big television
screen inside. If you could only watch the outside world
through this screen, you would naturally get bored of it
after a while and want to get out.
Consider for a moment that the place you are in is no different.
Inside your dark little skull, similar to a box, you watch
visions of the outside world during your life. You continue
watching all of these pictures in your brain without getting
out of this small place and never get tired of it.
In addition to this, you would never believe that you were
watching all of these things from a single screen. The vision
is so convincing that in thousands of years, billions of
people were unable to realize this great reality.
|
In
short, someone sitting in his living room and looking out of the
window is in reality looking at his living room, and the view
seen from the window on a screen in his brain. What a human being
would refer to as "my life" is a collection of all perceptions
being put together in a meaningful way and watched from a screen
in the brain, and one can never come out of one's brain.
We can never know the true nature
of the original of the material world outside the brain. We cannot
know, whether or not the original, for example the green of a
leaf, is as we perceive it. Likewise, we can never find out if
a dessert is really sweet or whether that is just how our brain
perceives it to be. Imagine, for example, a landscape you have seen before. That landscape is not in front of you, but you are seeing it in your brain. The science writer Rita Carter says:
Whenever we recall a given object, face or scene, we do not get an exact reproduction but rather an interpretation, a newly reconstructed version of the original… Although they may appear to be good replicas, they are often inaccurate or incomplete. (Rita Carter, Mapping the Mind, University of California Press, London, 1999, p. 135)
The same thing applies to the time when you look at a landscape. There is in fact no difference between your imagining a landscape from a distance and seeing it close up. Therefore, when you look at a view you are actually seeing a version constructed in the brain, not the original.
Anyone who considers this will clearly
see the truth. One such person, George Berkeley, expresses this
truth in his work A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human
Knowledge:
By sight I have the ideas
of light and colours, with their several degrees and variations.
By touch I perceive hard and soft, heat and cold, motion and
resistance... Smelling furnishes me with odours; the palate
with tastes; and hearing conveys sounds... And as several of
these are observed to accompany each other, they come to be
marked by one name, and so to be reputed as one thing. Thus,
for example, a certain colour, taste, smell, figure and consistence
having been observed to go together, are accounted one distinct
thing, signified by the name apple; other collections of ideas
constitute a stone, a tree, a book, and the like sensible things...12
The truth Berkeley
expresses in these words is this: We define an object by interpreting
different sensations that are experienced in the brain. As is
the case in this example, the taste and smell of an apple, its
hardness and roundness and those sensations related with the other
qualities of it are perceived as a whole by our brain and we perceive
this whole as the apple. However, we can never actually deal with
the original of the apple, only our perception of it. What we
can see, smell, taste, touch or hear are only the copies within
the brain.
When we
consider all that has been discussed up to this point, the truth
will be revealed in all clarity. For example:
o If we can see a street full of
colorful lights and all the colors with their own brilliant shadings
inside the brain where there is no actual light, then we are seeing
copies of the notice boards, lights, streetlights and the headlamps
of cars which are produced from the electric signals within the
brain.
o Since no sound can enter the brain,
we can never hear the original of the voices of loved ones. We
hear only copies.
o We cannot feel the cool of the
sea, the warmth of the sun - we only feel the copies of them in
our brains.
o In the same way, nobody has been
able to taste the original of mint. The taste someone would sense
as mint is only a perception which occurs in the brain. This is
because the person cannot touch the original of the mint, see
the original of the mint or smell or taste the original of the
mint.
In conclusion, throughout our lives
we live with copy-perceptions which are shown to us. However,
these copies are so realistic that we never realize that they
are copies. For example, lift your head and have a look around
the room. You see that you are in a room full of furniture. When
you touch the arms of the armchair in which you are sitting, you
feel the hardness of it as if you are really touching the original
of it. The reality of these images shown to you, and the excellent
artistry in the creation of these images are sufficient to convince
you and billions of other people that the images are "the original of the external matter". Even though most people have read that every sensation relating to the world is formed in their brains, since it is taught in high school biology classes, the images are so convincing that they have difficulty believing that they are actually dealing with only copies in their brain. The reason for this is that each image is created very realistically and perfected to an art.
Nobody has been able to move out of the perceptions that exist in the brain. Everybody lives in the cell that is in the brain, and no one can experience anything except that which is shown by his perceptions. Consequently, one can never know what happens outside of his perceptions. Thus to say "I know the original of matter" would in fact be an unjustified presupposition, because there is nothing that could be held up as evidence. The observer deals with the images formed in his or her brain. For instance, a person who wanders in a garden full of colorful flowers can in fact never see the actual of the garden, but its copy in his brain. Yet, this garden is so realistic that every person gets the same delight from the garden formed in his brain as if it’s the actual one. Even so that billions of people have surmised seeing the original of all they have seen just like that garden.
We should also emphasize that scientific
or technological development cannot change anything, as every
scientific discovery or technological invention occurs in the
minds of people, and consequently is of no help to people in reaching
the outside world.
A person driving a car believes
that the road and the trees he is driving past are far away
from him. However, everything he sees is actually on a single
plane in his brain just as in a photograph.
|
The Sense
Of Distance Is Also A Perception That Occurs In The Brain
Imagine a
crowd on a street, with shops, buildings, cars, horns honking…
When you look at this picture it appears to be real. That is why
most people cannot understand that the picture they see is produced
in their brain, and mistakenly suppose that they see the original of all of it.
The picture has been created so perfectly that it is impossible
to understand that the image that they perceive as real is not
the original of the outside world, but only a copied image which
exists in the mind.
The elements which make a picture so convincing
and impressive are distance, depth, color, shade and light. These
materials are used with such perfection that they become a three-dimensional,
colorful and vivid image inside the brain. When an infinite amount
of detail is added to the picture a whole new world emerges that,
without realization, we assume is real for all life, although
we only interpret it in our mind.
Imagine now
that you are driving a car. The steering wheel is at arms length
from you and there is a set of traffic lights about 100 m (or
300 ft) in front of you. The car in front of you is about 10 m
(30 ft) away, while there are mountains on the horizon, which,
according to your estimation, would be many kilometers (miles)
away in the distance. However, all of these estimations are wrong.
Neither the car nor the mountains are as far away as you would
assume. In fact, the entire picture, as on a movie reel, exists
on a two dimensional frame, on only one surface within the brain.
The images reflected to the eye are two-dimensional, like those
on a TV screen. In such circumstances, how can a perception of
depth and distance occur?
What is referred
to as a sense of distance is a way of seeing three-dimensionally.
The elements causing the effects of distance and depth in images
are perspective, shade and motion. The form of perception called
spatial perception by optical science is provided by highly complicated
systems. This system can be explained simply in this way: The
sight which reaches the eye is two dimensional. That is to say,
it has measures of height and width. The senses of depth and distance
result from the fact that two eyes see two different images at
the same time. The image that reaches each of our eyes differs
from the other in terms of the angle and light. The brain assembles
these two different images to form our sense of depth and distance.




In this picture, the line in the back
appears twice the size of the line at the front. However,
in reality both of the lines are the same size. As we can
see from this example, the use of lines, perspective, the
light and shadow cause people to observe the same objects
differently. In fact, all of these objects are viewed in a
single place, in the visual center of the brain. |
We can perform an experiment to understand
this better. First, extend your right arm in front of you and
hold up your index finger. Now focus on this finger while closing
your left eye first and then your right eye. Because two different
visions come to each eye, you will see the finger move slightly
to one side. Now open both of your eyes and while continuing to
focus on your right index finger, move your left index finger
as close to your eye as you can. You will notice that the closest
finger will have created two images. This is because now a different
depth has formed in the closer finger from that in the farther
finger. If you open and close your eyes one by one, you will see
that the finger located nearer your eye will appear to move more
than the finger which is further away. This is due to the increasing
difference in the views appearing in each eye.
While a three dimensional
film is being made, this technique is used; Images shot from two
different angles are placed on the same screen. The audience wears
special glasses which have a color filter and polarize the light.
The filters in the glasses filter out one of the two views, and
the brain transforms these into one single three-dimensional image.
The perception of
depth in a retina with two dimensions is very similar to the technique
used by artists to give the observer a feeling of depth in a picture
with two dimensions. There are certain factors resulting in the
feeling of depth, such as the placement of objects on top of one
another, the atmosphere perspective, changes in texture, linear
perspective, the dimensions, the height and the movement. For
example the change of texture is very important in perceiving
depth. For example, the ground that we walk on in a farm full
of flowers is actually a tissue. The tissues closer to us are
more detailed while the tissues further from us seem pale and
harder to discern. Therefore, it is easier to estimate the distance
of objects located on a tissue. Besides this, effects of shadow
and light also contribute to the perception of a three-dimensional
view.
The reason we admire
a picture made by a successful artist is the sense of depth and
reality which are given to the picture, which is created by using
the elements of shade and perspective
Perspective results from the fact
that distant objects appear smaller in proportion to those which
are nearer, depending on the person who is looking at it. For
example, when we look at a view, distant trees appear small, while
those nearby appear large. Likewise, in a picture with a mountain
in the background, the mountain is drawn smaller than the person
in the foreground. In linear perspective, artists use parallel
lines. For example, train tracks produce an effect of distance
and depth by meeting with the horizon.

|
One of
the elements which provide the feeling of depth
is tissue differentiation. Tissues closer to us can be observed
in detail while those further away appear less clearly. For
example as we can observe from the picture on the side, a
three dimensional tissue has been created on a paper with
the feeling of depth, and which seems to be embossed due to
the use of color, shadow and light. Even though all the dots
are white in the picture to the right, they appear to be flashing
in both black and white. |
 |
The method that painters
use in their paintings is also valid for the image that occurs
in the brain. Depth, light and shade are produced by the same
method in two dimensional space in the brain. The greater the
amount of detail in the picture, the more realistic it appears
and the more it deceives our senses. We behave as if there was
real depth and distance, as if there was a third dimension.
CREATING A PICTURE
WITH DEPTH ON A TWO
DIMENSIONAL SURFACE

|
However, all pictures
are like a film square on a flat surface. The visual cortex in the brain is extremely small! The distances, the images
such as those of distant houses, stars in the sky, the moon, the
sun, airplanes flying in the air, and birds - they are all crammed
into this small space. That is to say, there is technically no
distance between a glass that you can hold by extending your hand
and an airplane that, if you looked up, you would understand to
be thousands of kilometers above; all of them are on the single
surface, that is, in the sense center of the brain.
For example, a disappearing
ship on the horizon is not actually miles away from you. The ship
is in your brain. The window sill that you are looking at, a poplar
tree in front of the window, the road in front of your house,
the sea and the ship on the sea are all in the sight center of
the brain, on a two dimensional surface. Just like a painter can
represent the feeling of distance on a two dimensional canvas
by using the proportions of size, elements of color, shade and
light and perspective, so can the sense of distance also occur
in the brain. In conclusion, the fact that we sense objects to
be far away or nearby should not fool us, as distance is a sensation
like all the others.
There is a very realistic depth
in all of these pictures. A three-dimensional view with
depth can be formed on a two-dimensional canvas by making
use of shade, perspective and light. This element of realism
can be increased depending on the ability of the painter.
The same can be said for our own sight perception as well,
as the vision that reaches the retina in fact exists in
two dimensions. However, the images reaching each of our
eyes become a single image, so that our brain perceives
a three-dimensional image with depth.
|

12- George Berkeley,
A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, 1710,
Works of George Berkeley, vol. I, ed. A. Fraser, Oxford, 1871
p. 35-36
Home Page
|